How Am I Doing 2: Computing the Language of Appraisal in Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
There has been a wide body of design research about the categorisation of design text by the content or role of the text. However, recent research on information use in design has suggested the need to consider the semantic orientation toward the subject matter because the orientation might signal design rationale and other critical meta-functions. This paper presents a computational implementation of a natural language classifier for the understanding of appraisal in design text, that is, the expression of an opinion or attitude toward the designed work, the design process, and the design team. Using the supervised machine learning technique of support vector machines and data from informal and formal design documents, including transcripts of conversations between designers, we find that machine learning techniques can be trained to categorise the semantic meaning of design documents and the orientation of the opinion expressed in the document.
منابع مشابه
I am not Prejudiced, or am I? Semantic Strategies Used by Ghanaian University Students in the Discourse of Ethnic Prejudice
Semantic strategies are a kind of discourse strategy that include the sum of language and cognitive moves which are used to reach an adequate goal of communication normally resulting in text comprehension by the reader or listener. Here, the language user takes a number of steps in order to perform a complex task. Semantic strategies in prejudiced talk have been examined extensively in western ...
متن کاملOur Sense of Identity: “Who am I?” Gender and Cultural Studies
Identity is seen as a cultural and social construct, which indicates how we have been embodied and how we might represent ourselves. The knowledge that identities are the outputs of discourses is a familiar characteristic of some societal concepts. Gender, as an identity or a sense of our identity we build for ourselves, rather than something we are born with, is a constructed cultural category...
متن کاملExploring the Patterns of Evaluative Language in Physics Blurbs: The Appraisal Strategies in Focus
The current study qualitatively examined blurbs in the discipline of physics which is perceived to be less infused with evaluative resources and more objective and impersonal in its textual argumentation. The study followed the appraisal framework proposed by Martin and White (2005) to see how interpersonal meaning is textually constructed in blurbs. Findings indicated that writers of the blurb...
متن کاملConstruction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see ho...
متن کاملProcess Writing and Enhancement of Critical Thinking Ability: Is Writing a Vehicle or an Ingredient of Critical Thinking?
The study aimed to investigate the relationship between process writing (PW) and critical thinking (CT) ability of Iranian EFL learners. Furthermore, the role of PW in the enhancement of CT was investigated. In so doing, 125 upper-intermediate language learners were selected from Islamic Azad University based on convenience sampling. The results of pretest administration indicated that particip...
متن کامل